Did Orphan Black Go Too Far With Its Latest Death? 

Did Orphan Black Go Too Far With Its Latest Death? 

http://ift.tt/2rtCtKj

All Photos Courtesy BBC America

The second episode of Orphan Black’s final season crossed a line even I didn’t expect, killing off a fan-favorite character in a cruel, sadistic, and fairly sexist way. I’m still not sure how I feel about it, but it isn’t good.

The episode, “Clutch of Greed,” brought us one of the first major clone deaths in a while, with Ferdinand killing M.K. by repeatedly stomping on her chest. It was a starkly violent scene, complete with the sound of crushing bones, as Ferdinand used the death to take out his sexual frustration against Rachel, since M.K. was disguised as her at the time to try and help Sarah and Kira.

In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, show creators Graeme Manson and John Fawcett said it made sense to have Ferdinand kill M.K. because of their longstanding conflict. After all, Ferdinand murdered M.K.’s best friend during the Helsinki incident, and as a result M.K. spent years working to enact revenge against him (she didn’t kill him, but she did take all of his money). They also wanted to remind the audience that “nobody is safe” on Orphan Black.

Advertisement

“We don’t kill clones easily, but I guess it was just M.K.’s time,” Manson said.

It’s true that Ferdinand had a grudge against M.K., and wanted to complete his mission, but I’m really upset by how his obsession with Rachel factored into it. He and Rachel have had a dominant-submissive sexual relationship for a while (with Ferdinand as the sub), but Rachel has refused him lately because of her devotion to Neolution founder P.T. Westmoreland. M.K.’s death didn’t feel like Ferdinand finishing the mission he started, it was a revenge fantasy against the woman cuckolding him. After all, he said: “You hurt me, Rachel!” as he crushed M.K.’s ribcage. It made M.K.’s death more about him.

This makes me uneasy, as it plays into the trope of men using violence, often against women, to deal with sexual frustration. This is something that has had real-world consequences, like we saw with University of California-Santa Barbara shooter Elliot Rodger. Furthermore, I don’t see what value it brings to the story. We’re already aware how demented Ferdinand is… and it’s been well established that no one is safe on this show. So, what did this add specifically, and was it worth it to compromise a key character’s death?

Advertisement

I’m willing to give the show some time to make up this mishap, but it’s going to take a lot more than Ferdinand’s death to wash the blood clean.

TECH|SCI

via io9 http://io9.gizmodo.com

June 18, 2017 at 02:24PM

Advertisements

What do you think about this?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s